Skip to content

Arkansas Employment and Unemployment in September & October

This morning’s reports from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services were mixed, with contradictory signals from the household and payroll reports continuing to confound clear interpretation of the data.  Due to the federal government shutdown in October, release of the September data was postp0ned to coincide with the October release, so we have two months of statistics to consider.

Household report:
The headline statistic was an uptick in the Arkansas unemployment rate in October– to 7.5%.  September’s unemployment rate was unchanged from the previous month at 7.4%.  The October increase coincided with a rise in the national unemployment rate from 7.2% to 7.3%, and can be at least partly attributed to the government shutdown.  Although the BLS has described some ambiguity in the survey results for October, most government workers who were furloughed over the first part of the month appear to have been correctly classified as being temporarily unemployed.

Recent trends in Arkansas employment, unemployment and labor force participation continued over during September and October.  The number of employed declined by more than 2,800 over the two-month period, while the number of unemployed increased by over 1,200.  Accordingly, the Arkansas labor force contracted by approximately 1,600 workers.  As shown in the set of charts below, these trends are alarming.  The household survey data are showing that the number of employed has dropped by over 44,000 since January of 2012, along with a labor force decline of 46,000 over the same period.  The number of unemployed — which had been in decline in 2012 and early 2013 — has increased by 4,500 since April.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Payroll Report:
In contrast to the household data, the survey of employers showed positive employment growth in both September (+900) and October (+5000).  Compared to October 2012, the latest payroll employment figure shows a net increase of 10,000 jobs.  This is in sharp contrast to the nearly 30,000 employment decline over the same period in the household survey.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

Payroll employment gains were distributed across several service-providing sectors, along with a two-month net increase in manufacturing employment.  Growth in transportation and utilities was particularly robust, accounting for 2,600 jobs.  Employment in retail trade also experienced a strong gain (+1,600).  Overall, payroll employment in October was up more than 40,000 since the employment trough of February 2010, but still approximately 17,000 below pre-recession levels.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

The contrast between the trends in the payroll and household surveys is something of a puzzle.  Both are based on survey data, and are subject to both sampling and non-sampling error.  But additional information from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) appears to more consistent with the payroll data than the household data.  So although it is possible that the payroll employment figures will eventually be revised downward, it appears unlikely that they will be revised to show anywhere near the job losses that the household data are showing.

# # #

*Seasonally adjusted data for Arkansas nonfarm payroll employment, reported in a format compatible with the monthly news release from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, can be found at the following links:  September and  October.

Metro Area Unemployment Rates – August 2013

Catching up from the federal government shutdown, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released August unemployment rates for the nation’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) yesterday.  The data were originally scheduled to come out on October 2.

For Arkansas’ metro areas, the results were decidedly mixed.  The not-seasonally adjusted data showed year-over-year unemployment rate changes that ranged from +0.6% in Pine Bluff to -0.7% in Fort Smith.  From August 2012 to August 2013, the unemployment rate declined in three MSAs and increased in four.  In Little Rock (and statewide) the rate was unchanged.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Monthly changes — calculated using smoothed seasonally adjusted estimates — were also mixed.  From July to August, the unemployment rate declined in Fort Smith, Memphis and Texarkana.  It was up one-tenth in Pine Bluff, and unchanged in the remaining metro areas.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

Note:  Payroll employment statistics were compiled before the government shutdown, and were previously reported on Arkansas Economist (here).

Arkansas Employment and Unemployment – August 2013

Another disappointing employment report for Arkansas:  The latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services show that unemployment was up again in August, but not enough to raise the unemployment rate from the 7.4% level of July.  Over the first 8 months of 2013, the unemployment rate has crept up by 0.3%, while the number of unemployed has increased by 2,710.  The number of employed from the household survey declined by 5,322 in August, contributing to a net loss of 27,490 since December of 2012.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Payroll Survey:
The report on nonfarm payroll employment for Arkansas was no more encouraging.  The net change in employment from July to August was -1,200 (seasonally adjusted).  Employment was lower in most sectors, including a declines of 600 in Construction and 800 in Wholesale Trade.  Two sectors did show month-over-month increases:  Financial Activities (+700) and Manufacturing (+900).  Over the past 12 months, we’ve seen healthy gains in Retail Trade, Education & Health Services, and Transportation & Utilities, but several sectors have seen declines.  Notably, the goods-producing sectors have continued to show net declines.  Compared to August 2012, payroll employment has increase by just 12,200 — approximately 1.0%.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

The household data and payroll data continue to provide conflicting signals:  As shown in the figure below, payroll employment has continued to trend upward (albeit slowly and irregularly), while the household employment measure has been falling since the beginning of 2012.  It seems likely that the annual benchmark revisions to the payroll data will ultimately be negative, bringing the two employment measures into closer alignment.  With the release of the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages next week, we are likely to see some evidence supporting this conjecture.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

# # #

*Seasonally adjusted data for Arkansas nonfarm payroll employment, reported in a format compatible with the monthly news release from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, are available here:  Table – Seasonally Adjusted NFPE.

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – July 2013

Unemployment rates in the state’s metro areas showed some improvement in July.  Compared to the previous year, not seasonally-adjusted data showed lower unemployment rates in six of the eight Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) that cover parts of Arkansas.  The largest decline was in Fort Smith (-0.8%).  The unemployment rate was unchanged in Memphis, and was up by 0.3% in Pine Bluff.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Smoothed seasonally adjusted estimates of unemployment rates also showed declines from June to July.  The unemployment rate in Hot Springs was unchanged, but each of the other Arkansas MSAs ticked downward.  The rate in Texarkana dropped by two-tenths.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

Payroll Employment
Data on nonfarm payroll employment were mixed.  From June to July, employment rose sharply in Fayetteville and Texarkana.  Hot Springs and Jonesboro also showed increases.  Employment was unchanged in Little Rock, but declined in Fort Smith, Pine Bluff and Memphis.  Six of the eight MSAs have shown positive employment growth over the past year, and all but Pine Bluff shown net increases since the national and statewide employment trough of February 2010.  Employment is now higher than pre-recession levels (December 2007) in four of the eight MSAs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

Arkansas Employment and Unemployment – July 2013

The latest report on state-level employment and unemployment suggests ongoing weakness in Arkansas labor markets.  The unemployment rate edged up to 7.4% (although the increase from June’s 7.3% rate was literally a matter of rounding error).  At 7.4%, the Arkansas unemployment rate is unchanged from a year ago and is now at the same level as the U.S.  This is the first time since the early months of the recession that the Arkansas unemployment rate has not been lower than the national average.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

July’s uptick in the unemployment rate was primarily due to a decline in the number of employed persons (-4,764).  The number of unemployed was basically unchanged (+37).  Due to the fall in employment, the overall size of Arkansas’ labor force declined — resuming the trend that we’ve seen over the past year-and-a-half.  Since January 2012, the Arkansas labor force is down by nearly 40,000 — approximately 2.9%.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll Survey:
Total nonfarm payroll employment was up by 1,900 in July (seasonally adjusted) — a fairly modest increase but a welcome change from the declines of the two previous months (revised).  Goods-producing sectors showed a collective decline of 1,600 jobs while service-providing sectors expanded by 3,500 — mostly in the areas of Health Services and Professional & Business Services.  Compared to a year ago, Arkansas employment is up by 13,600, mostly from increases in Health Services, Retail Trade, and Transportation & Utilities.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

As with the household survey, the data from the payroll survey indicate that the pace of Arkansas’ recovery from the 2008-09 recession is lagging behind the U.S. average.  Although the recession did not hit Arkansas as hard as the rest of the country, employment at the national level has shown steady improvement while Arkansas’ employment growth has been irregular and slower, on net.  As of July 2013, cumulative changes in employment since the beginning of 2008 measure -1.5% for the U.S. and -1.8% for Arkansas.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

#  #  #

*Seasonally adjusted data for Arkansas nonfarm payroll employment, reported in a format compatible with the monthly news release from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, are available here:  Table – Seasonally Adjusted NFPE.

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – June 2013

Unemployment rates in Arkansas metro areas were basically unchanged from May to June (seasonally adjusted), but were higher than a year ago in four of the eight metro areas.  First, the not-seasonally adjusted figures shown in the table below reveal that unemployment rates have increased over the past 12 months in Fort Smith, Memphis, Pine Bluff, and Texarkana.  Rates were unchanged in Hot Springs and Jonesboro, and have fallen slightly in Fayetteville and Little Rock.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

The news release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics noted that 272 of the nation’s 372 metro areas had lower unemployment rates than a year earlier.  The four metro areas in Arkansas that had higher rates than a year earlier were among the 73 areas nationwide that have experienced increases.  Hot Springs and Jonesboro were among the 27 metro areas across the country where unemployment rates were the same as in June 2012.

To evaluate monthly changes, the second table shows smoothed seasonally adjusted estimates of metro area unemployment rates.  From May to June, rates were unchanged in all metro areas except Pine Bluff, which showed an uptick of 0.1 percentage points.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

Payroll Employment
The payroll employment survey for June showed modest declines in Hot Springs and Pine Bluff, no change in Texarkana, and increases in the rest of the state’s metro areas.  The largest percentage increase for the month was in Fort Smith, up 0.8%.  Compared to June 2013, payroll employment has declined in Hot Springs, Pine Bluff and Texarkana, but is up in the remaining MSAs.  The monthly increase in Little Rock was large enough to push employment above its level in December 2007 — prior to the onset of the 2008-09 — for the first time since the recovery began.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

Arkansas Employment and Unemployment – June 2013

The latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services show continuing stagnation in Arkansas labor markets.  The unemployment rate was unchanged at 7.3%, where it has held for most of the past 18 months.

With the number of employed down by 1,732 in June and the number of unemployed up by 628, the state’s labor force declined by 1,104.  Hence, the tentative signs of improvement in the Arkansas’ labor force participation rate that we had seen over the past two months did not persist.  Over the past 12 months, the household survey is showing a decline in employment of nearly 21,000.  The number of unemployed is down by 1,685 but most of that decline took place in the second half of 2012.  Over the first 6 months of 2013, the number of unemployed has shown a net increase of 1,935.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Payroll Survey
The payroll survey showed no change in employment for the month (seasonally adjusted).  Employment declines were recorded in Manufacturing, Financial Services, Professional & Business Services, and Education & Health Services.  Employment in the retail sector fell rather sharply (-1,700).  Other service sectors registered employment increases, led by Other Services (+1,900) and Transportation & Utilities (+1,200).  Construction employment was also up slightly.  Compared to a year earlier, payroll employment was up by 8,500.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

The latest data from the household and payroll surveys continue to give conflicting signals.  Since mid-2012 the payroll survey has shown slow but positive employment growth while the household survey has shown employment declining sharply.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

One indication of the eventual reconciliation of these trends is suggested by the most recent data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW).  The QCEW data are considered more accurate than the monthly payroll surveys, and are used to revise the payroll data during the annual benchmark revision process.  In the most recent release, the QCEW showed an employment increase of only 1,900 jobs during 2012 (December 2011 through December 2012).  In contrast, the current payroll data indicate job growth of 4,000 for the same period.  This suggests that when the payroll data are eventually revised, they will show slower job growth than current payroll statistics are suggesting — at least for the second half of 2012.

#  #  #

*Seasonally adjusted data for Arkansas nonfarm payroll employment, reported in a format compatible with the monthly news release from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, are available here:  Table – Seasonally Adjusted NFPE.

 

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – May 2013

The lead from today’s metro area employment and unemployment report noted that “unemployment rates were lower in May than a year earlier in 253 of the 372 metropolitan areas.”  Unfortunately, none of Arkansas’ Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) were included in that tally.  As shown in the table below, only in Fayetteville was the unemployment rate unchanged compared to May 2012.  Around the rest of the state, increases in unemployment rates ranged from +0.2% in Jonesboro to +0.7% in Pine Bluff.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

As is typical for May, the not-seasonally-adjusted unemployment rates rose compared to the previous month.  But even after seasonal adjustment, rates were higher in May than they were in April.  The smoothed seasonally adjusted metropolitan area estimates, shown below, showed upticks in unemployment rates for all of the state’s MSAs except Little Rock.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

In part, the higher unemployment rates were attributable to expansions of the labor force.  From April to May, the labor force increased in all of Arkansas’ metro areas except Hot Springs (which was essentially flat).  The number of employed increased in Fayetteville, Fort Smith, Jonesboro and Little Rock.  Nevertheless, the number of unemployed increased in all eight metro areas.

Payroll Employment
In the employer survey, job growth among Arkansas metro areas was mixed.  From April to May, payroll employment declined in Fayetteville, Hot Springs and Texarkana.  Compared to a year ago, employment was lower in Hot Springs, Pine Bluff and Texarkana.  Only Fayetteville and Jonesboro continue to show higher payroll employment than pre-recession levels.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Estimates (CES)

Payroll vs. Household Employment
In the context of the statewide employment situation, we have noted that the household and payroll surveys are showing widely divergent trends.  Over the past 12 months, the payroll survey reports a net increase of about 3,000 jobs statewide while the household survey indicates a decline of more than 23,000 jobs.  The discrepancy carries over into the metro area data.  As shown in the table below, household-based employment estimates are showing declines in every MSA except Fayetteville and Jonesboro, while the payroll survey shows only 3 metro areas with year-over-year declines.  In every case, the household survey is showing weaker employment growth than the payroll survey.  Note that the discrepancy does not apply to U.S. data — in fact, the nationwide payroll survey is showing stronger growth than the household-based data.  Given the magnitude and persistence of the divergence, it seems likely that an explanation or reconciliation will only be possible after subsequent revisions of the data.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Arkansas Employment and Unemployment – May 2013

The pattern of sluggish labor market performance in Arkansas in recent months continued into May.  According to new data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, the unemployment rate ticked up one-tenth of a percent to 7.3% from a revised 7.2% in April.  (The revision to the unemployment rate for April amounted to only 0.00004%, but that was enough to tip the rounding error upward.) The national unemployment rate also rose by one-tenth in May, to 7.6%.  As shown in the chart below, the gap between the state and national unemployment rates has continued to narrow over time.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

There were a couple of positive tidbits in the report from the household survey:  The number of employed and the size of the total labor force were up for the second consecutive month.  Both of these indicators had been declining precipitously since early 2012.  However, the number of unemployed was up by over 1700, bringing the total number of unemployed back up to a level comparable to last October.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

Payroll Survey
Data from the survey of employers was no more encouraging than the household survey:  Nonfarm payroll employment declined by 5,900 (seasonally adjusted*).  Many of the service sectors that have been supporting employment growth during the slow recovery were down in May.  For example, Professional & Business Services fell by 2,300 and employment in Leisure & Hospitality Services was down 1,100.  Even employment in Education & Health Services fell by 900.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Two bright spots in the payroll survey:  Although it remains lower than a year ago, construction employment was up 700 from April to May (seasonally adjusted*).  Jobs in retail trade also increased — up by 1,100.  Retail sector employment is now nearly 13,700 higher than at the employment trough of February 2010, and up 6,700 from pre-recession levels.  Although several service sectors showed employment declines for the month, overall employment in services is generally  higher than before the recession.  But with employment in goods-producing sectors down by over 41,000 since December 2007,  the overall recovery of jobs since February 2010 has been only 32,600 (compared to 57,100 job losses between December 2007 and February 2010).

Mixed Signals
Neither the household survey nor the payroll survey provided much in the way of good news this month.  But more disturbing is the conflicting employment trends indicated by the two reports.  Over the past 12 months, payroll employment has increase by around 3,000 jobs — not very strong growth, but positive.  Over the same period, however, the household survey is showing a decline of more than 23,000 jobs.  It is not unusual for the two surveys to give conflicting signals in the short-run, but rarely do they diverge this significantly over a longer period of time.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Generally speaking, economists consider the payroll survey to be more accurate, but it is also subject to considerable future revision as more detailed information becomes available.  It is quite likely, therefore, that the divergence between household and payroll reports will be reconciled by a downward revision to the payroll data.  Annual revisions will not be officially published until next March, however, so we’ll be monitoring incoming data closely in an effort to sort through the differences we’re seeing between the two surveys.

#  #  #

*Seasonally adjusted data for Arkansas nonfarm payroll employment, reported in a format compatible with the monthly news release from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services, are available here:  Table – Seasonally Adjusted NFPE.

Metro Area Unemployment and Employment – April 2013

Progress toward lower unemployment rates in Arkansas metro areas has ground to a halt.  Statistics for April show that unemployment rates were higher than a year earlier in all the state’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) except for Fayetteville.  The press release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that Fayetteville was one of 276 MSAs around the nation that saw a year-over-year decline.  The state’s other MSAs were among the 78 metro areas that saw higher unemployment rates.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)

The year-over-year comparisons refer to data that are not seasonally adjusted.  For meaningful month-to-month comparisons, the BLS publishes smoothed seasonally adjusted estimates.  As shown in the table below, these estimates show that the unemployment rate was steady in Fort Smith and Jonesboro, but ticked up in the seven other metro areas that include parts of Arkansas.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

Underlying statistics from the household unemployment-rate data also showed a monthly uptick of employment in the state’s two largest metro areas, but reveal a downward trend in all of the state’s MSAs except for Fayetteville.  As illustrated in the figure below, the downturn in employment is particularly noticeable since the beginning of this year.  In Hot Springs and Texarkana, household employment is more than 2-1/2% lower than in January 2012.  The reason that unemployment rates haven’t risen in response to these employment declines is due to commensurate downward trends in labor force participation.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

In the statewide data, weak household employment data have contrasted with improving statistics from the payroll employment reports.  The same puzzle seems to exist in the MSA data.  As shown in the table below, nonfarm payroll employment increased in several of the state’s metro areas in April.  Compared to a year earlier, payroll employment was higher in Fayetteville, Hot Springs, Jonesboro, Little Rock, and Memphis.  Employment was flat in Fort Smith and down in Pine Bluff and Texarkana.  Pine Bluff remains the only metro area to have experienced continued contraction since the statewide employment trough of February 2010.  At the other extreme, both Fayetteville and Jonesboro have higher payroll employment in April 2013 than they did before the onset of the 21008-09 recession.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

The contrast between the household and payroll employment reports is a puzzle.  Typically, the payroll reports are considered to be more accurate, but are also subject to substantial revision.  For that reason, the renewed weakness in household employment is a concerning trend that we will continue to monitor closely.