Skip to content

Metro Area Unemployment & Employment – November 2014

The Bureau of Labor Statistics released new data on metro area unemployment and employment yesterday.  The report noted that unemployment rates in November were down compared to the previous year in 341 of the 372 metropolitan areas in the nation.  The eight metro areas that contain portions of Arkansas were all included in that total.  Not-seasonally adjusted unemployment rates declined by more than a full percentage in each of the state’s metro areas over the past 12 months, with the largest decline being a 2.7 percent drop in Pine Bluff.

In the recent statewide unemployment report, Arkansas’ unemployment rate dropped by three-tenths of a percent in November (seasonally adjusted).  Comparable figures for the state’s metro areas do not uniformly reflect this dramatic decline.  From October to November, data from the Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates show declines of only one-tenth in Fort Smith, Hot Springs, Jonesboro and Memphis.  Texarkana was down two-tenths and Pine Bluff was down three-tenths.  Unemployment rates in Fayetteville and Little Rock were unchanged.  Although the magnitude of unemployment rate declines were smaller for most metro areas than the statewide average, the underlying components were all generally encouraging.  The number of unemployed was down in all eight metro areas, and the number of employed was higher in all except Memphis.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll Employment
Nonfarm payroll employment increased by 0.5% statewide in November, but the gains were not reflected evenly across the state’s metro areas.  In a fact, payroll employment was down in both Hot Springs, Memphis and Pine Bluff.  Employment in Texarkana was unchanged and Little Rock saw only a slight increase.  Compared to a year ago, employment has declined in Fort Smith and Pine Bluff, but has increased in the state’s other metro areas.  Only Jonesboro has surpassed the nationwide growth rate of 2.0%.  In fact, at 2.9%, Jonesboro is the only metro area in the state to be growing faster than the statewide average of 1.5%.  Compared to pre-recession levels of seven years go, employment has increased in Fayetteville and Jonesboro, but is still lagging behind in most other metro areas.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – October 2014

Unemployment rates declined in all of Arkansas’ metro areas in October.  On a year-over-year basis, the not-seasonally adjusted numbers showed declines ranging from 1.5% in Fayetteville to 2.9% in Pine Bluff.  The eight metro areas that include parts of Arkansas were among the 354 out of a total of 372 that saw declines from the previous year.  Smoothed seasonally adjusted estimates showed monthly declines in all eight metro areas as well.  Unemployment declined by 0.3% from September to October in Pine Bluff, and 0.2% in Fort Smith and Memphis.  Rates were down by 0.1% in the remaining metro areas.  Moreover, household employment and labor force figures showed monthly increases in all of Arkansas metro areas except Memphis.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll employment reports were more mixed.  Total nonfarm payrolls were down slightly in Fayetteville, Fort Smith and Texarkana, but were higher in Hot Springs, Jonesboro, Memphis and Pine Bluff.  Employment in Little Rock was unchanged.  The increase in Pine Bluff was particularly notable:  up 1.7% for the month.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

There are still only two metro areas in the state that have seen net employment gains compared to pre-recession levels (December 2007):  Fayetteville and Jonesboro.  The unchanged employment figure for Little Rock left the total unchanged since the pre-recession peak.  Three of the state’s metro areas have actually seen continued employment declines since the trough of February 2010:  Fort Smith, Pine Bluff, and Texarkana.

Arkansas House Prices – 2014:Q3

The latest update on house prices from the Federal Housing Finance Agency came out this morning.  The most comprehensive of the FHFA indexes, the “Expanded-Data Indexes” show Arkansas house prices up 1.3% in the third quarter, compared to a 1.5% increase nationwide (seasonally adjusted).  Over the past four quarters, Arkansas house prices were up 3.4%, while U.S. prices rose by 6.0%.

Source:  Federal Housing Finance Agency
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency

Readings on house prices in Arkansas metro areas were mixed.   From the second quarter to the third quarter, prices in Fayetteville, Hot Springs and Pine Bluff all increased sharply.  However, prices were down in the state’s other metro areas.  Over the past year, Fayetteville, Hot Springs and Memphis have shown the largest cumulative gains.

Source:  Federal Housing Finance Agency; seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency; seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement.

The figure below displays a slightly longer-run view.  Relative to the nationwide house-price peak at the beginning of 2007, prices are higher or unchanged in most of the state’s metro areas.  The chart shows that the three metro areas that have shown the most rapid appreciation over the past year or two are the same areas that exhibited the largest declines during and after the recession.  For example, prices in Northwest Arkansas declined by nearly 20% from the beginning of 2007 until mid-2011, but have since recovered to the point of being only 9%  below the 2007 peak.

Source:  Federal Housing Finance Agency; seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement.
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency; seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement.

Local Area Personal Income – 2013

The Bureau of Economic Analysis released new statistics on local area personal income this morning.  The new data for metro areas and counties show a pronounced slowdown in economic growth in 2013 compared to 2012, but the slowdown was not unique to Arkansas.  Nationwide, per capita personal income growth slowed from 4.4% in 2012 to 1.3% in 2013.   As shown in the table below, Fayetteville was the only metro area in Arkansas that grew faster than the national average in 2013.   Growth in three of Arkansas metro areas was negative in 2013, and with the exception of Northwest Arkansas none of the state’s metro areas experienced growth above 1%.  Revised figures for 2012 show that the slowdown in 2013 was particularly sharp in Arkansas, with all metro areas falling from above average growth in 2012.  Taking a somewhat longer view, two-year average growth rates for all of Arkansas’ metro areas except Texarkana exceeded the nationwide average.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

The same pattern of sharp deceleration was evident in the county-level data as well.  Each of Arkansas’ 75 counties experienced a slowdown in growth between 2012 and 2013.  Individual county growth rates ranged from a high of 6.9% in Scott County to a low of -4.6% in Hempstead County.  Above-average growth was more common among individual counties than among metro areas:  34 of the state’s counties had growth rates that exceeded the national average.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Levels of per capita income continue to vary widely across the state.   In 2013, three of Arkansas’ counties had per capita personal income above the national average:  Pulaski, Union, and Arkansas counties.  At the other extreme, Sevier county had per capita income that was only 55.7% of the U.S. average.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Metro Area Unemployment & Employment – August 2014

This morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released new information on unemployment and employment in metropolitan areas.  The BLS News Release reported that unemployment rates were down from a year earlier in 322 of the nations 372 metropolitan areas.  All eight of Arkansas’ metro areas were included in that total, with the year-over-year declines ranging from 0.9% in Fayetteville to 1.8% in Pine Bluff.

The not-seasonally adjusted data show that the unemployment fell rather sharply from July to August, but that is a typical seasonal effect.  (For example, over the past 10 years, the not-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Arkansas has, on average fallen by 0.57% between July and August, while the seasonally adjusted average was +0.03% for the same monthly change.)  Data from the Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates show that there was little change in metro-area unemployment rates after taking account of the usual seasonal swing:  Unemployment rates declined by one-tenth of a percentage point in Fort Smith and Pine Bluff, increased by one-tenth in Memphis, and were unchanged in the remaining metro areas.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Over the past several months, we have noted a sharp decline in labor force participation in Arkansas.  In the report on statewide unemployment in August, we saw a slowdown of that trend.  As shown in the figure below, most of the state’s metro areas have shown a similar downward trend in the size of their labor forces since March 2014.  The weakening of the downward trend is also evident in most of the state’s metro areas (with the notable exception of Memphis).

There is no clear explanation of why we have seen such a sharp downward trend since spring.   One pattern that appears to generally hold in the figure below is the relationship between cumulative labor force contractions and the more recent weakening of the downward trend.  In particular, the metro areas that have experienced the largest cumulative reductions in labor force participation during 2013 and 2014 continue to trend downward.   The weakening of the downward trend is more apparent in metro areas that have only recently been subject to a declining labor force.  In fact, the labor force in Jonesboro — where cumulative increases over the past two years have been the largest — edged slightly higher in August.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics (Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates)

Payroll Employment
Statewide payroll employment growth was essentially zero in August, with metropolitan areas showing a wide range of changes.  From July to August, employment was down in four metro areas (Little Rock, Memphis, Pine Bluff and Jonesboro) and was up in the remaining four (Fayetteville, Texarkana, Fort Smith and Hot Springs).   Over the past year, only Pine Bluff has seen a net reduction in payroll employment (-1.4%), with increases in other metro areas ranging from +0.5% in Fort Smith to +1.9% in Jonesboro.  Compared to pre-recession employment levels, only Jonesboro and Fayetteville have seen net increases.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

Metro Area GDP in 2013

New data on GDP growth in metropolitan areas was released this morning by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.  The data show robust growth in Northwest Arkansas, but rather sluggish growth in other parts of the state.  In June, data on real GDP growth by state showed that Arkansas’ economy grew at a rate of 2.4% in 2013, well above the national average of 1.8%.  The metro data show that growth to be concentrated in the Fayetteville-Springdale-Rodgers Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which grew at a 5.6% rate.  Fort Smith and Hot Springs grew slightly faster than the national average for metropolitan areas, while Jonesboro and Little Rock expanded at growth rates of less than one percent.  Memphis, Pine Bluff and Texarkana each showed negative growth from 2012 to 2013.  Out of the total of 381 MSAs in the United States, only Fayetteville, Fort Smith and Hot Springs ranked above the median growth rate.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Although the metro GDP data are based on the best information presently available, the figure for 2013 will be subject to future revision.  As shown in the table, data for 2011 and 2012 were revised substantially since the last metro GDP report a year ago.  Data for Northwest Arkansas were subject to particularly large revisions.  Previously published data had shown growth rates of 0.1% and 0.5% in 2011 and 2012.  The revised data show growth rates of 4.4% and 1.9%.  At the other end of the scale, growth rates for Texarkana were revised downward rather sharply.

The new data also report on GDP per capita, which might be considered a better indicator of economic performance (because it accounts for differences in population growth).  Statewide, GDP per capita in 2013 was $39,111 in 2013 (inflation-adjusted 2009 dollars) — amounting to 79.6% of the national average.  As shown in the chart below, there are some significant differences in GDP per capita among the state’s metro areas.  Little Rock is the only metro area with GDP per capita exceeding the national average in 2013 (102%).  Memphis and Fayetteville stood at 90% and 80% of the national average, respectively.  The lowest per capita GDP was for Hot Springs:  the 2013 figure of $34,918 amounts to only 59 percent of the national average GDP per capita.  Since the recession trough in 2009, real GDP per capita has increased substantially in Fayetteville (+13.8%) and Hot Springs (+12.3%). It has increased more slowly in Fort Smith (+6.0%),  Jonesboro (+4.7%), Pine Bluff (+3.5%) and Memphis (+0.4%).   Little Rock and Texarkana have seen negative growth in real GDP per capita since 2009 (-2.0% and -1.5%, respectively).

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Metro Area Unemployment and Employment – July 2014

Unemployment rates continued to trend downward in most of Arkansas’ metro areas in July.  However, as with the statewide data, unemployment rates are falling against a backdrop of sharp declines in the labor force.

The typical summer spike in unemployment continued to drive month-to-month changes in the not seasonally adjusted data.  Compared to the July 2013, however, unemployment rates were down by more than a full percentage point for all metro areas except Memphis.  The largest year-over-year declines were in Fort Smith, Jonesboro, and Pine Bluff, all showing declines of 1.7 percentage points.

Adjusting for the predictable summer effect, data from the Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates showed unemployment rates generally falling from June to July.  Rates declined by 0.1 percentage pointes in Fayetteville, Hot Springs and Little Rock; and were down 0.2 percentage points in Jonesboro and Pine Bluff.  Rates in Fort Smith and Texarkana held steady, while the rate in Memphis increased by 0.3 percentage points.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

In the context of the statewide unemployment report, we have noted that the number of employed and the civilian labor force has been declining sharply this summer.   Over the past four months, employment has fallen by 21,632 (-1.7%) and the labor force has contracted by 32,374 (-2.4%).  As shown in the table below, the declines are also reflected in most of the state’s metro areas.  The largest percentage declines are in Fort Smith and Hot Springs.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll Employment
Monthly changes in payroll employment were mixed across Arkansas MSAs.  Employment declined in Pine Bluff, Texarkana and Fort Smith.   Small increases were reported in the state’s remaining metro areas.  The declines in Fort Smith and Pine Bluff represent continued weakness:  Employment is down from a year ago in both of those metro areas.  Compared to pre-recession employment levels, Fayetteville and Jonesboro remain the only metro areas in the state that have seen positive net job growth.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Metro Area Employment & Unemployment – June 2014

New statistics on employment and unemployment in Arkansas’ metro areas shows continuing declines in unemployment rates.  However, concerns about statewide labor force participation are also apparent in the metro area data.   As shown in the table below, not-seasonally adjusted unemployment rates have fallen sharply over the past 12 months.  The declines range from -1.2% in Fayetteville, Little Rock and Texarkana to -1.9% in Pine Bluff.  The most recent monthly changes show slight upticks.  However, the change in unemployment from May to June is subject to predictable seasonal increases.  After adjusting for recurring seasonal effects, the seasonally adjusted data show that the unemployment rate declined in June for every metro area except Memphis.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

In the statewide data for June, we noted that the unemployment rate was declining against a backdrop of a declining labor force — particularly over the past three months.  As shown in the following chart, the declining labor force from March through June is distinctive for most of the state’s metro areas as well.  Over the past three months, we see sharp labor force participation falling in every metro area except Memphis.  In some cases (Little Rock, Fort Smith, and Pine Bluff), the downward trend has been ongoing throughout 2014.  Relative to January 2013, the only metro area that has experienced a net increase in its labor force is Jonesboro.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll Data
Information from the survey of employers shows one-month declines in employment for five of Arkansas’ metro areas.  Compared to a year ago, however, only Fort Smith has seen a decrease.  Although net employment has been increasing since February 2010, the cumulative percentage increase for the state has only been 3.1%, and employment in Fort Smith, Pine Bluff and Texarkana has declined, on net, over that period.  Compared to pre-recession employment levels, only Fayetteville and Jonesboro have moved into positive territory.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Metro Area Unemployment and Employment – May 2014

Unemployment rates in Arkansas’ metro areas continue to trend downward.  For the period from May 2013 through May 2014, not-seasonally adjusted data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show declines ranging from 0.9 percentage points in Fayetteville and Little Rock to 1.7 percentage points in Memphis.  Statewide, the unemployment rate has fallen 1.1 percentage points over the past 12 months.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

On a month-to-month basis, the not seasonally adjusted data indicate that unemployment rates moved higher in May.   However, this is a typical seasonal effect.  Unemployment rates usually rise in the early to mid-summer — in part due to effects related to the end of the school year.   After adjusting for these recurring seasonal patterns, unemployment rates declined in May for all eight of Arkansas’ metro areas.  The Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates show declines of 0.2 percentage points in Jonesboro, Pine Bluff and Texarkana; and declines of 0.1 percentage points in the other five metro areas.  A graph of the smoothed seasonally-adjusted estimates (below) illustrates the downward trend that has prevailed across all of Arkansas’ metro areas since late last summer.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Payroll Employment
In the other half of the metropolitan area report, payroll employment continued to be disappointingly weak across the state.  Total employment was down in six of the eight metro areas, with small increases in Fayetteville and Memphis.  Compared to a year ago, employment is higher in all metro areas except Texarkana — but the gains are relatively small.  Year-over-year employment growth has been positive but less than one percent in Fort Smith, Memphis and Pine Bluff.  Payroll employment is still lower than its pre-recession peak an all metro areas except Fayetteville and Jonesboro.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Metro Area Unemployment & Employment – April 2014

The national and state unemployment reports for April had shown a distinctive combination of statistics:  relatively large declines in unemployment rates, accompanied by sharp drop-offs in labor force participation.  Data for Arkansas metro areas released this morning show the same pattern.

Compared to a year ago, unemployment rates have dropped significantly.  The not-seasonally adjusted data in the table below show declines ranging from 0.8% in Fayetteville and Little Rock to 1.9% in Memphis.  According to this morning’s news release, Arkansas’ metro areas were among the 357 of 372 metro areas nationwide that experienced declining unemployment rates over the past 12 months.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Employment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Employment Statistics (LAUS)

As was true for the state and national data, monthly changes in the unemployment rate were uncharacteristically large.  According to the smoothed seasonally adjusted data shown below, unemployment rates dropped by as much as 0.4% in Memphis and Pine Bluff.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

But the April declines in unemployment rates are not unambiguously positive news.  As was the case with the state and national data, the changes in metro area unemployment rates were driven by declining labor force participation.  The smoothed-seasonally adjusted data show labor force declines in April ranged from 0.3% in Memphis to 0.8% in Fort Smith.  The concern is that the unemployment rate is not falling because more unemployed are finding jobs, but because more unemployed are becoming discouraged and leaving the labor force (or the state).

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Smoothed Seasonally Adjusted Metropolitan Area Estimates

Payroll Employment
The data from the separate survey of employers does little to assuage concerns about the employment statistics from the household survey.  Monthly changes in nonfarm payrolls were mixed around the state:  employment declined in Fort Smith, Memphis and Pine Bluff, but increased in the state’s other metro areas.  Nevertheless, year-over-year gains have generally been modest.  Jonesboro and Fayetteville have seen sizable gains in employment over the past 12 months, but gains in the state’s other metro areas have been relatively small.  Employment in Pine Bluff continues to decline.  Compared to pre-recession employment levels, only Fayetteville and Jonesboro have surpassed previous peaks.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics (CES)

The April employment statistics represent just one monthly observation.  Recent employment reports have painted a picture of improving labor market conditions–with unemployment falling and labor force participation rising.  The April data broke from these patterns, but it is too soon to say whether this represents a weakening of previous trends or simply a one-month anomaly.