Skip to content

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – December 2010

End-of-year statistics for employment and unemployment in in metropolitan areas were released this morning by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Unemployment rates (seasonally adjusted*) declined slightly in most of Arkansas’ MSAs in December, but rose in Fort Smith.  As shown in the chart below,  The lower unemployment rates we saw during the summer were transitory — evidently associated with of temporary Census employment.  Rates generally ended the year slightly higher than they were in January, rising by 0.3 to 0.5 percentage points in most of the state’s metro areas.  Fort Smith showed an end-of-year increase that took its unemployment rate to 8.6%, up by 0.7  percentage points from January.   Only Texarkana’s unemployment rate declined over the course of the year, falling slightly to 7.3 percent in December. 

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Employment statistics from the payroll survey showed employment increases in all of Arkansas’ metro areas in December.  Hot Springs, Jonesboro and Pine Bluff showed significant increases.  For the year as a whole, employment was up in three MSAs:  Hot Springs, Texarkana and Jonesboro.  In fact, employment in Jonesboro remains higher now than it was at the start of the recession in December 2007.  At the other extreme, employment in Fort Smith is now down 8% from the start of the recession. 

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

#    #    #

*Seasonally adjusted data for MSA Payroll Employment are available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  However, data for unemployment rates are not.  In order to facilitate comparisons over different months of the year, unemployment rates are seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement using the conventional Census-X12 ARIMA procedure.

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – October 2010

This morning, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the latest information (for October) on employment and unemployment in Metropolitan Statical Areas (MSAs) around the nation.  The report suggests that labor markets in Arkansas’ metro areas are slowly improving.

Household Suvey:
Unemployment in three of Arkansas’ MSAs  fell in October (seasonally adjusted data*).  Rates in both Hot Springs and Texarkana were down 0.1% while Pine Bluff fell 0.3%.   Rates in Fort Smith and Little Rock were unchanged.  Only two MSAs saw higher unemployment:  Rates in Fayetteville and Jonesboro both rose by 0.2%.

Sources:  Bureau of Labor Statisics, UALR Institute for Economic Advancement
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statisics, UALR Institute for Economic Advancement

It might appear that unemployment rates around the state are following a rising trend.  But if we take a step back and look at the pattern that rates have followed over the course of 2010 it looks more like a mini-double dip employment recession.

Sources:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, UALR Institute for Economic Advancement
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, UALR Institute for Economic Advancement

In actuality, the patterns in the data are related to the hiring and subsequent layoffs of temporary Census workers.   Arkansas’ MSA’s have followed the same pattern seen in statewide and national data:  rates falling from around April until July, then rising until September or October, leaving unemployment rates about where they were in April.  This matches the timing of the surge in the employment of temporary Census workers.  Netting out this effect, unemployment has been approximately flat for most of 2010.

Payroll Survey:
Changes in nonfarm payroll employment provide encouraging signs:  October employment growth was zero or positive in each of the state’s MSAs.  This is not surprising, given the state-level data showing that Arkansas’ employment growth was the fastest in the nation in October.  Since the end of 2009, payroll growth has been positive in three of the seven MSAs.  Relative to a last October, growth has been positive in four MSAs.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

In terms of recovering the jobs that were lost during the recession, the figure below shows the cumulative change in employment since the start of the recession (December 2007).  Employment in the MSA’s of Hot Springs, Jonesboro, Texarkana — and more recently, Pine Bluff — have begun to increase from their low points earlier in year.  In fact, Jonesboro has experienced positive net employment growth since the start of the recession.  The other metro areas have a long way to go.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Although the effects of temporary Census workers have distorted the statistics, unemployment rates appears to be stabilizing.  And payroll employment figures are showing signs of real improvement (particularly in some areas of the state).  Employment statistics are lagging indicators (especially the unemployment rate), so even though we are nearly 1 – 1/2  years into the recovery it is likely to take considerably more time before the employment situation returns to a healthy state.

#    #    #

*Seasonally adjusted data for MSA Payroll Employment are available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  However, data for unemployment rates are not.  In order to facilitate comparisons over different months of the year, unemployment rates are seasonally adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement using the conventional Census-X12 ARIMA procedure.

Metro Area Employment – A Slow Summer

Earlier this week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its latest report on employment and unemployment in the nations Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).  The data indicate that it has been a slow summer for job growth in Arkansas’ MSAs.

Unemployment data for August (not seasonally adjusted) showed that the unemployment rate ticked up by one-tenth of a percent in three of the state’s MSAs, and was unchanged in the other four.  However, August is typically a month in which the unemployment rate experiences a seasonal decline.  Adjusting the data for this recurring seasonal pattern, the data show that unemployment rose substantially in each of the state’s seven metro areas.  For four of the seven metro areas, the increase in seasonally-adjusted unemployment in August follows an uptick in July as well.

Sources:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement

Payroll employment growth in Arkansas MSAs also showed weakness in August.  From July to August, employment increased in Fort Smith and Hot Springs, but declined in each of the other metro areas.   For the first eight months of the year, only Hot Springs and Texarkana have shown positive job growth.   Compared to the previous year, employment is lower in five of the seven MSAs, with positive year-over-year changes recorded for Jonesboro and Texarkana. 

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Since the onset of the recession in December 2007, cumulative job losses vary considerably across metro areas.  Employment in Jonesboro has recovered to about the same level as at the end of 2007.  At the other end of the spectrum, Fort Smith has seen job losses totalling 8.2 percent.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Metro Area Personal Income – 2009

Statistics on personal income for the nation’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in 2009 were released this morning by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).  The national economy was hitting the trough of a recession in 2009, so it is not surprising that the majority of MSAs experienced negative growth last year.  From the BEA press release:  “Personal income declined in 223 MSAs, increased in 134, and remained unchanged in 9 MSAs. On average, MSA personal income fell 1.8 percent in 2009, after rising 2.7 percent in 2008.”

The map of metro areas from BEA, displayed below, shows that income growth in Arkansas’ MSAs was mixed, but generally better-than-average.  Pine Bluff was in the highest-growth quintile, with Little Rock in the second quintile.  The remainder of the state’s MSAs ranked in the third and fourth quintiles, with none finishing among the bottom fifth.

MSA2009

Table 1 provides more detail, comparing personal incomes of Arkansas’ MSAs to the total metropolitan portion of the U.S.  Personal income declined in 5 of the state’s 7 MSAs, but increased in the Pine Bluff and Little Rock.   Income growth in each of Arkansas’ MSAs out-performed the nation’s metro areas as a whole.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Table 2 shows figures for per capita income in Arkansas MSAs.  In per capita terms, only Pine Bluff experienced positive income growth in 2009;  Its growth rate of 1.6 percent puts it in the top 25 among the nation’s metro areas.  Fayetteville’s per capita income declined slightly more than the national average, and Jonesboro’s decline was about equal to the total metropolitan portion of the U.S.  The other 5 MSAs in Arkansas experienced smaller losses than other metro areas across the nation.

Source:  Bureau of Economic Analysis
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

The last two columns of Table 2 show per capita income in Arkansas’ MSAs as a percent of per capita income in the metropolitan portion of the U.S.  The latest data show that Arkansas’ metro areas generally remain below-average.  Fort Smith, Jonesboro, and Pine Bluff are in the lowest quintile of MSA per capita personal income.  Fayetteville, Hot Springs, and Texarkana are in the fourth quintile.  The MSA with the highest per capita income, Little Rock, ranks in the second quintile.  Despite the fact that Arkansas’ metro areas outperformed other parts of the country in 2009, they gained little ground terms of per capita income.

The 2009 comparison of personal income in Arkansas’ MSAs to the rest of the nation’s metro areas is affected by two factors.  First, the recession in Arkansas was not generally as severe as in many parts of the country.  This accounts for the fact that all of Arkansas’ MSAs experienced above-average income growth.  On the other hand, evidence from statewide income growth and Arkansas taxable sales suggest that Arkansas reached a trough in economic activity in the third quarter of 2009 — one quarter later than the national economy.  This tends to depress measured growth rates for the year compared to those parts of the country that entered an economic recovery phase earlier than Arkansas.  As a result, the annual income statistics for Arkansas’ MSAs in 2009 reflect more weakness than do current economic conditions.

Metro Area Employment and Unemployment – June Update

June data for metro area employment and unemployment came out earlier this week (see Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment Summary from the BLS).  According to the raw numbers—not seasonally adjusted—unemployment rates were unchanged or higher in each of the state’s metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs).   However, June is typically a month in which unemployment ticks upward for purely seasonal reasons.   One factor:  teachers and students are off for the summer, and students in particular are reported as being unemployed if they are seeking, but fail to find summer jobs.** 

After accounting for these recurrent patterns, seasonally adjusted statistics paint a much brighter picture.  Unemployment rates fell in every one of the state’s MSAs.  In many cases, the declines were substantial.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Employment statistics for June (seasonally adjusted by the BLS) showed that payrolls fell in most of Arkansas’ MSAs.  Employment was down by 0.1% in Fayetteville, down 0.9% in Fort Smith, down 0.6% in Little Rock, down 0.4% in Memphis and down 1.1% in Pine Bluff.   Employment was unchanged in Jonesboro, but was up by 0.3% in Hot Springs and up 0.2% in Texarkana.

Cumulative job losses in the state’s MSAs since the start of the recession have varied considerably.   The chart below shows the percentage decline for each MSA since December 2007.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Jonesboro has lost the fewest jobs:  total losses reached a peak of 2.2% in April but have recovered over the past two months.  Similarly, Texarkana has come back from a cumulative loss of 3.3% in December of last year to a total loss of only 1.2% as of June.  Hot Springs losses totalled 6.7% in April, but have bounced back to within 3.8% of the December 2007 level.  Employment in the remaining MSAs is at or near recent low points, having yet shown little sign of recovery.

#   #   #

**The June 2010 issue of Arkansas Labor Market, from the Department of Workforce Services, includes a feature article describing some of the reasons that employment data show seasonal fluctuations.

Arkansas Home Prices – 2010:Q1

This morning, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) released the latest data on house prices for states and metropolitan areas.  The data for Arkansas show a rather sharp decline in in the first quarter of 2010:  The purchase-only index was down 2.5 percent from a year earlier, while the all-transactions index was down 1.4 percent over the same period.  (For a description of these indexes, see the previous post, Home Prices in 2009.)

Source:  Federal Housing Finance Agency
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency

In the first quarter of 2010, house prices were down rather sharply in four of the state’s metro areas.  [For Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), only the all-transactions indexes are available.]  Prices were down 4.8 percent in Fort Smith, 2.7 percent in Northwest Arkansas, 1.5 percent in Jonesboro and 1.1 percent in the Little Rock area.  Hot Springs, Pine Bluff and Texarkana all recorded small increases for the quarter.  

Source:  Federal Housing Finance Agency
Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency

Compared to a year earlier, house prices are lower in every Arkansas MSA except Pine Bluff.  Over the longer run, however, prices in each of the states MSAs are higher than five years ago (2005:Q1).

Update on Metro Area Employment and Unemployment

Metro area unemployment rates for March 2010 were released last week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Arkansas Department of Workforce Services.  Over the first three months of 2010, seasonally-adjusted unemployment rates rose in all of Arkansas’ Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).  The Pine Bluff MSA continued to register the highest unemployment rate in the state: 9.9% in March–slightly above the national average of 9.7%.  All of the state’s other metro areas were below the national average, with the lowest rate being 6.6% in the Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers MSA.

Sources:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement

Nonfarm payroll employment was up sharply in the statewide data for March (see previous post).  For the state’s metro areas, employment was unchanged or up slightly in six of the seven MSAs.  Only Texarkana showed a decline for the month. However, Texarkana had shown increases earlier in the year and it is the only MSA in Arkansas with positive employment growth, on net, over the most recent three months (from December).

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Compared to March of last year, employment in March 2010 was down in all of Arkansas metro areas.  In percentage terms, Jonesboro showed the smallest decline:  down by only -0.6 percent.  Having shown a sharp decline in the first three months of 2010, employment in Hot Springs is down by 3.2 percent from a year earlier.

Metro Area Employment & Unemployment – January 2010

The latest information on employment and unemployment for Arkansas Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) was released last week.   The data for January were mixed.  There were no clear signs of recovery in regional labor markets, but no further deterioration was evident either.  This is consistent with the statewide data reported in a previous post–showing the state’s unemployment rate unchanged with only a small increase in payroll employment.

Household Survey

As displayed in the table below, the household survey showed that changes in unemployment rates around the state were mixed.  The unemployment rate ticked up in the Fayetteville, Fort Smith, Hot Springs and Texarkana.  It was unchanged in Little Rock and declined in Jonesboro and Pine Bluff.  

Sources:  Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Institute for Economic Advancement

The drop in Pine Bluff’s unemployment rate was particularly sharp.  In recent years, Pine Bluff has experienced large swings in employment and unemployment from December to January.  The changes were smaller this year, resulting in a measured decline in the seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate.   We’ll have to wait and see whether this is just a statistical fluke or a significant change.

Payroll Survey

The January payroll survey also showed mixed changes in employment.  Seasonally adjusted, January payroll employment was up slightly from the previous month in Texarkana, unchanged in Jonesboro, and down a bit in the state’s other MSAs. 

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
(Note:  Although we have seen no formal annoucement of the change, the BLS public database now provides seasonally adjusted payroll employment data for Arkansas MSAs.  Assuming that this practice continues, the Arkansas Economist will henceforth rely on these official seasonally adjusted series, rather than using data adjusted by the Institute for Economic Advancement.)

Benchmark Revisions

This data release also included the annual benchmark revisions that have been discussed extensively in recent posts on the Arkansas Economist (MSA revisions were discussed here).  As expected, the revised data show sharply greater job losses during the recession than were previously reported — for most of the state’s MSAs.  The revised data show that Jonesboro was the only metro area to show positive growth in 2008, and all of the states MSAs suffered employment losses during 2009.  The decline in Fort Smith was particularly steep.

Source:  Bureau of Labor Statistics
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

Although the revisions showed larger employment declines for most of Arkansas’ MSAs, the revised data for Pine Bluff show that job losses were not as large as previously reported.  In this case, it’s no fluke.  The updated statistics are based on very accurate data from the Quarterly Census of Wages and Employment (QCEW)  for 2008 and early 2009.  

The anomolous upward revision to the payroll data for Pine Bluff was anticipated in a previous post on the Arkansas Economist.  A more complete evaluation of our exercise in “forecasting a revision of history” is forthcoming.